Chevron Left
Back to Global Diplomacy – Diplomacy in the Modern World

Learner Reviews & Feedback for Global Diplomacy – Diplomacy in the Modern World by University of London

4.7
stars
5,596 ratings

About the Course

The Global Diplomacy course is a unique offering to the MOOC environment. Bringing together cutting edge research in the broad fields of Diplomatic and International Studies, award winning distance learning delivery and the instructors previous experience of delivering a successful MOOC. Please see the volume Global Diplomacy: Theories, Types and Models authored with Dr Alison Holmes, (Westview, 2016), and the Understanding Research Methods MOOC from Coursera. The Global Diplomacy MOOC has a direct heritage in the University of London International Academy/SOAS Global Diplomacy MA Programme launched in April 2013 which have attracted hundreds of students from around the world. The Global Diplomacy MA Programme is provided by the Centre for International Studies and Diplomacy which has been teaching postgraduate courses in Diplomacy for over twenty five years. After completing the 'Global Diplomacy' MOOC, learners will have: 1. The ability to demonstrate a critical understanding of the nature and development of global diplomacy, drawing on a variety of relevant contributing disciplines in the broad field of International Studies. 2. An understanding of changes in diplomatic practices and procedures and the relationship of those changes to contemporary politics. 3. A sound grounding in both theoretical and empirical approaches to debates in diplomacy so that students have been exposed to the and skills needed to analyse global diplomacy. 4. knowledge of issues in global diplomacy in historical and contemporary contexts....

Top reviews

SS

May 28, 2020

Great course. I had a general interest in diplomacy and wanted a little taste of what it was, this course has provided me just that. It has amazing resources to help enhance our knowledge of diplomacy

IZ

Jan 4, 2023

Excellent pace and decent efforts required for assignments. Course is well crafted, not boring but it could be made a little bit more interactive with online MCQs based while on the go quizzes.

Filter by:

1276 - 1300 of 1,577 Reviews for Global Diplomacy – Diplomacy in the Modern World

By Shane M

Dec 31, 2021

Nice

By Ali M H

Dec 11, 2021

good

By Muhammad t a

Sep 26, 2021

good

By Osama s h a

Jan 12, 2021

Good

By Suprotik C

Aug 12, 2020

Good

By Mona A A

Jun 4, 2020

good

By jovanna H

Feb 11, 2017

good

By Hidayatullah i

Dec 26, 2016

Good

By Nazilə M

Feb 3, 2026

5/5

By Бисенбаева К А

Jul 24, 2025

Тиг

By AASHNA R

Apr 29, 2025

yes

By José Y G

Jul 9, 2023

exe

By Фот Н С

Jun 1, 2017

вам

By Асемов М Ж у

Nov 20, 2024

,,

By Wadha A A

Aug 15, 2022

,

By Vardah I

Jul 30, 2020

👍

By Badria a h

Feb 22, 2023

-

By mahima k

Oct 22, 2022

By KEN

Aug 31, 2022

O

By Beatriz C

Jul 7, 2022

By Nahid A

Feb 13, 2021

T

By Maxamed M

Nov 3, 2020

w

By Charlie B

May 6, 2020

I

By Dipesh T

Sep 21, 2017

U

By Patricia M

Apr 4, 2022

During the course, there was the request that errors in the script should be made known if possible so that the script text could be corrected. I submitted various corrections but cannot see that they have been implemented and am wondering if and how such consructive submissions are actually heeded by the organisers of the course.

Some of the material that was to be downloaded was not possible and when I sent an enquiry on how to access the docments/information, I received no response. This is not conducive to motivating participants when they have the feeling that no one is attending their queries.

I would like to know how the system works on this type of course as the previous courses I have enrolled in were of a different nature than this one.

I found the challenges of composing essays on the individual themes each week quite a challenge and enjoyed researching the themes even though we were restricted in the number of words permitted. Sometimes I was disappointed that some participants did not fulfil the required number of words and again wondered how the organisers deal with such submissions?

How is it possible to receive a feedback from Simon Rolfe?

Looking at some of the +submissions over the weeks, I noticed that some were quite "old", i.e. a few years old and was wondering if the content of the videos was similar and just generalities were being put forward. The link to some further reading was also not of the recent past, does this mean that standard material is being used and not updated?

In general, I found that the videos in week 5 were a resume of the previous ones with considerable repetitions and another issue that puzzled me was the fact that after week 4 I was informed that I had "passed" the course when, in my opinion, the most challenging essay was the one to be submitted was at the end of week 5. How is this possible? Was the essay at the end of week 5 not of importance to the organisers of the course?

I would appreciate an acknowledgement of my comments and some answers as well. Thank you!