Learner Reviews & Feedback for Global Diplomacy – Diplomacy in the Modern World by University of London
About the Course
Top reviews
SS
May 28, 2020
Great course. I had a general interest in diplomacy and wanted a little taste of what it was, this course has provided me just that. It has amazing resources to help enhance our knowledge of diplomacy
IZ
Jan 4, 2023
Excellent pace and decent efforts required for assignments. Course is well crafted, not boring but it could be made a little bit more interactive with online MCQs based while on the go quizzes.
1276 - 1300 of 1,577 Reviews for Global Diplomacy – Diplomacy in the Modern World
By Shane M
•Dec 31, 2021
Nice
By Ali M H
•Dec 11, 2021
good
By Muhammad t a
•Sep 26, 2021
good
By Osama s h a
•Jan 12, 2021
Good
By Suprotik C
•Aug 12, 2020
Good
By Mona A A
•Jun 4, 2020
good
By jovanna H
•Feb 11, 2017
good
By Hidayatullah i
•Dec 26, 2016
Good
By Nazilə M
•Feb 3, 2026
5/5
By Бисенбаева К А
•Jul 24, 2025
Тиг
By AASHNA R
•Apr 29, 2025
yes
By José Y G
•Jul 9, 2023
exe
By Фот Н С
•Jun 1, 2017
вам
By Асемов М Ж у
•Nov 20, 2024
,,
By Wadha A A
•Aug 15, 2022
,
By Vardah I
•Jul 30, 2020
👍
By Badria a h
•Feb 22, 2023
-
By mahima k
•Oct 22, 2022
By KEN
•Aug 31, 2022
O
By Beatriz C
•Jul 7, 2022
By Nahid A
•Feb 13, 2021
T
By Maxamed M
•Nov 3, 2020
w
By Charlie B
•May 6, 2020
I
By Dipesh T
•Sep 21, 2017
U
By Patricia M
•Apr 4, 2022
During the course, there was the request that errors in the script should be made known if possible so that the script text could be corrected. I submitted various corrections but cannot see that they have been implemented and am wondering if and how such consructive submissions are actually heeded by the organisers of the course.
Some of the material that was to be downloaded was not possible and when I sent an enquiry on how to access the docments/information, I received no response. This is not conducive to motivating participants when they have the feeling that no one is attending their queries.
I would like to know how the system works on this type of course as the previous courses I have enrolled in were of a different nature than this one.
I found the challenges of composing essays on the individual themes each week quite a challenge and enjoyed researching the themes even though we were restricted in the number of words permitted. Sometimes I was disappointed that some participants did not fulfil the required number of words and again wondered how the organisers deal with such submissions?
How is it possible to receive a feedback from Simon Rolfe?
Looking at some of the +submissions over the weeks, I noticed that some were quite "old", i.e. a few years old and was wondering if the content of the videos was similar and just generalities were being put forward. The link to some further reading was also not of the recent past, does this mean that standard material is being used and not updated?
In general, I found that the videos in week 5 were a resume of the previous ones with considerable repetitions and another issue that puzzled me was the fact that after week 4 I was informed that I had "passed" the course when, in my opinion, the most challenging essay was the one to be submitted was at the end of week 5. How is this possible? Was the essay at the end of week 5 not of importance to the organisers of the course?
I would appreciate an acknowledgement of my comments and some answers as well. Thank you!