It´s a decent course for absolute beginners. but it´s a bit outdated and not very interactive.

Outdated , but the concepts need change it like Framework RICCE something like that

Having current experience with ChatGPT, this course seems somewhat dated.

It was decent, but could have been half the length of time. Too verbose

Some of the content is outdated now as the tech has changed rapidly.

Les vidéos sont trop longues et j'espérais un cours plus poussé.

At this point a lot of the tactics presented are very dated.

Information is quite outdated. Still helpful but outdated.

The lesson explanation was long and boring.

I believe it is already obsolete, sorry.

Excellent course, I highly recommend it

Can be kept more examples and topics

I felt the videos were too long.

A bit too basic, and outdated-

outdated but still useful

okay but a little boring

a lot of repetition

Slightly out dated

GOOOD COUSE

helpfull

helpful

A lot of this field is people forgetting that the study of Humans exists. As a result, a lot of this is NOT groundbreaking just new for the TECH Professor. This course fails to understand that AI did not create patterns or how they work. It is trying to reinvent the wheel when skilled experts understand why the wheel exists. Your wife was the perfect example. She was the Expert, but because you saw the AI that came out first. Moreover, it is way too long. The Patterns are basically knock-offs of the others. The People change one thing, and name it, and say invented it!! Very Typical. Just so very typical. Again, it is just the Macro level that is missing. The person that says "Hey, are we sure we did not do this before?". Please limit the Modules to actionable input. The Tests are a Joke and an insult. Please provide real tests or nothing. Videos. Omg the Video from the course take a ungodly long time to load. That is a website issue. As both a Lawyer and a Tech expert, to me, all 6 models could be replaced by AI. Why on earth not? Never have a written a review like this for a professor, but again Why would I pick this course over AI?

Honestly, I was pretty disappointed with this course.. The lecturer tends to over-explain, and the overall structure felt lacking. I often found myself losing focus because the content was overloaded with too much repetition. In my opinion, less is more - streamlined explanations and a clearer structure would make it much easier to follow and actually learn something new.

Usually Dr. Jule's courses are very educational. However there was too much information in one course. I would suggest this one course be divided into two courses with more opportunities to use these new prompts. It was very complicated and too much information o learn at once

Wow. Disappointing. A niche use case as a "motivating" example by someone who "didn't see this coming" which would indicate a lack of intimate knowledge of the space. Not a thought leader I would invest valuable resources on. Moving on with said resources. ie time and coin